Instructions for the
Reviewer: Please, complete PART I
only, and e-mail it back as an
attachment to the e-mail address at the bottom of this page.
(Blind Review Form)
Journal
refereeing process: Conference
Dates:_______________________________
1.
Part
I should be completed by the reviewer only.
2.
Part
II should be completed by the ooi Academy Conference Program Committee only.
To the Reviewer: Could you please help to determine if this
Journal paper is worthy of presentation at the ooiCTRLD conference and
appearance in the refereed publication of the ooi Academy.
To the Author(s): Kindly use the revision comments (if any)
below to make corrections to your paper and re-submit it to the ooiCTRLD
Headquarters if PART II item Paper is accepted with revision and please
re-submit is checked below.
Information
on the paper: To be provided by the ooiCTRLD Service Region Director.
1.
Title
of the paper:
2.
The
area of academic discipline of the paper:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART
I: FOR THE REVIEWER ONLY. (Please, X one of the
choices.)
1.
Is the content of the paper of interest to you?
..
.
( )5 (
)4 ( )3 ( )2
( )1
2.
Is there anything new to be learned from the content of the paper?
..
( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
3.
Is the paper worthy of a presentation time slot in the conference program?
. ( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
Organization
of the paper:
1.
Does the abstract summarize the content of the paper?
..
( )5 ( )4
( )3 ( )2 (
)1
2.
Is the abstract followed by the introduction of the topic including literature
review?
( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
3.
Does the paper contain primary and or secondary data or model relating to the
topic?
.( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
4.
Is the data/model analyzed, discussed, findings identified and reported in the
paper?
.
.( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
5.
Does the paper end with conclusions, recommendations and or directions for
further study?
( )5
( )4 ( )3 (
)2 ( )1
6.
Does the paper have at least 4 references and all the listed references are
cited in the paper?
...( )5 (
)4 ( )3 ( )2
( )1
8.
How do you rank the paper?
.
( )5 ( )4
( )3 ( )2 (
)1
Comments
and or recommended revision to the paper: (Type your comments on additional page, if
you need more room.)
9.
10.
Initials of the reviewer:__________
Date: _______________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
( ) Paper is accepted as it is. ( ) Paper is accepted with revision and please re-submit it. (
) Paper is reject.
2.
Suggested revision to the content of the paper.
3.
Suggested revision to the organization of the paper.
4.
Suggested revision to the format of the paper.
5.
Comments.
_______________________________________________ ooiCTRLD Service
Region______________________________.
Signature
of the Representative.
Date:_______________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ooi
Consortium for Teaching, Research, Learning and Development (ooiCTRLD). Phone#: 1-318-254-0422
P.
O. Box 1392, Ruston, Louisiana 71273-1392, U. S. A. Fax#: 1-318-513-9497
Website: http://www.facultystudentconference.org E-mail:
facultystudentconference@yahoo.com